Layout Image
  • About
  • Banquet
  • Contact
  • Day of Action
  • Donate
    • Monthly Support
  • Get Updates
  • Leaders
    • Summer Retreat
      • Fall Outreach
      • Follow The Leader
  • On Campus
    • Campuses
    • Pregnant?
    • Resources

Archive for campus

Sidewalk Chalk and Hecklers

by GuestPoster
November 29th, 2010

On Sunday November 14, my college Pro-Life group had side walk chalked several, for lack of a better word, nifty Pro-Life sayings all over our college campus. Examples were “abortion hurts women”, “Pro-Life = Pro-Woman”, and Ronald Reagan’s famous quote on abortion only being advocated by those who have been born. Our hope was to raise awareness on the issue, since our campus had a lack of a pro-life voice in 2009-2010.

Well, we know that people certainly read it. The next day my group and I had looked at our masterpieces to see that they had been altered by a very concerned pro-choice student. The saying “Abortion hurts women” was suddenly changed to “Abortion saves Women” and Ronald Reagan’s famous quote was altered to say that “everyone who supports abortion has already been born [by choice].” I had heard some members of Students for life warning pro-life collegians to not be surprised if pro-choice groups
will pop up in reaction to us. I suppose I should have known what I was getting into.

I admit I was feeling a little disheartened, but the rest of my group wasn’t. Our group president gleefully assured us that this meant that someone read what we wrote and actually went to the trouble to take a trip to Wal-Mart to buy pink sidewalk chalk to react to it. It meant we were making an impact. While we can debate whether or not we had the last laugh in the end, the important thing to remember is to keep a positive attitude when being heckled. We are the only defense for the unborn and it would be foolish to let a little pink sidewalk chalk stop us.

- Nick Neal, Guest Blogger

Categories Pro-Life Activism
Comments (0)

Bringing SFL to Lewis University, Part 2

by GuestPoster
May 13th, 2008

This is a continuation of Part 1

After we recruited about sixty students – gathering names and email addresses, we created a spreadsheet of the students from the clipboard. I also started a facebook group for SFL Lewis and began making ourselves known throughout the Lewis network. I sent out an email to all of the potential members, in order to hold a preliminary meeting so that we could form the group.

Michael Barnett had told me that it is typical to bring in about 10% of the students on your email list for the first meeting. So I was not too surprised when I had about seven or eight students at my first meeting. We spent the first meeting discussing our own individual beliefs and stances on the issues. This was in order to establish a foundation of dialogue within the group. Most of the students were firmly against abortion, some were against the death penalty, and some even saw being pro-life as incorporating all issues pertaining to a respect for life and the well-being of others.

Throughout the first few meetings, we had a variety of different students who would come and go, but eventually we found the core members who were willing to give up some of their time every week to see this group succeed on campus. These members soon became officers.

I started the process of school recognition only a couple weeks after recruiting. Most of this process was typical of any school organization seeking campus recognition – a constitution, mission statement, list of officers, etc.

As our numbers were few, collective input for the mission statement and the constitution was minimal. One thing we learned is that a group should work on their mission statement and their constitution over a period of the first few years before they decide on exactly what it will say, instead of setting it in stone within the first few months. This gives the pro-lifers on campus a chance to determine the special needs and interests their own school has.

For example, some schools have separate organizations against the death penalty, and some have special groups that work to educate on genocide or war. Taking into account the other groups on campus can help shape the pro-life group and its efforts to educate on all life issues. The pro-life group can thus include not only abortion and euthanasia in their mission statement, but also these other issues, so as to show that we take interest in all issues pertaining to the respect for life.

At Lewis, we have a group called STAND, which is a social justice group that focuses primarily on genocide and the death penalty, and how human rights are affected by it. Meeting with groups like STAND, we hope to co-sponsor events pertaining to these issues so that we can begin building friendly relations with other groups on campus.

After we completed the paperwork, we prepared to meet with student government as the next step to being recognized by the university.

To be continued…

Categories Events, News, Pro-Life Campus Events, Students For Life of Illinois Event, Thoughts
Comments (0)

This is the way to do it folks!

by GuestPoster
April 10th, 2008

I just recently read an article in The Orion Online, the online publication for California State University, about the pro-life group on the Chico State campus of CSU, and about how its members are opening dialog by reaching out to discuss many pro-life issues other than abortion : “Life issues are not only on abortion,” said senior Jandi Pereida, president of the organization. “They include things like genocide, capital punishment and embryo research. We are trying to promote a culture of life. There needs to be awareness.”

Thank you to Chico State Students for Life for displaying a good example of effective campus pro-life work!

Full Article Here.

Categories News, Pro-Life Activism, Thoughts, Uncategorized
Comments (0)
Our Sponsoring Organizations
Students for Life of Illinois
Copyright © 2012 All Rights Reserved
iThemes Builder by iThemes
Powered by WordPress